How important is pace factor?

By: David Lister

By now you should already about how important pace factor can be when filling out your team’s roster. Players from the league’s more hectic-paced teams–Suns, Warriors, Pacers and Nuggets–often provide better production than players from the league’s slower-paced teams–Spurs, Pistons and Blazers–simply because their teams have more possessions per game.

But how much of a difference are we talking about? Is this over-analysis or really something fantasy owners should concern themselves with?

First, it’s absolutely a mistake to consider only pace factor. While the Supersonics have the sixth highest pace factor in the NBA (you need ESPN insider for this link), they also own the leagues second-worst offensive efficiency ranking, cancelling out any advantage they would have.

Now, let’s look at the extremes. Denver leads the NBA with 102.6 possessions per game, while Detroit is last with 90.5 possessions per game. If each team has a player logging 30 minutes per game, then the Denver player would be involved in about 7.5 more possessions per game (64.1 to 56.6), a pretty substantial difference.

So yes, there is something to this pace factor thing. At the same time, there are only a handful of teams (the Nuggets, Suns, Warriors and the Lakers) that boast both an above average pace factor as well as an acceptable offensive efficiency rating. Just something to keep in mind next time you make a transaction.

Tags: , , , ,

David Lister is the web editor for the National Sports Review. You can reach him at chicagosportsreview@gmail.com. Go Cards.

Share This Article

1 Comment

  1. [...] 8.5 points and 6.2 assists a game. He won’t put up points consistently, but you remember our pace factor discussion, right? Guys who play 30 minutes a night on the fastest-paced team in the league are never bad guys [...]

    Pingback by Five Potential Pickups « on January 13, 2008

Comment On This Article